![]() If the same hash function is used over two hops, all the traffic sorted from one hop to following one will arrive already having the same characteristics, which will render the next hash function useless. It is advised that LAG and ECMP hash function configuration over more than one hop is different. All (default) – all above fields are part of the hash calculations.Traffic Class – Load balance based on the traffic class assigned to the packet.Source and Destination IP & Port – destination and source IP, as well as destination and source UDP/TCP port: If the packet is not UDP/TCP, only SIP/DIP are used for the hash calculation.Destination IP & Port – destination IP (DIP) and destination UDP/TCP port: If the packet is not UDP/TCP, only DIP is used for the hash calculation.Source IP & Port – source IP (SIP) and source UDP/TCP port: If the packet is not UDP/TCP, only SIP is used for the hash calculation.The following load balancing types are supported: In symmetric hash functions bidirectional flows between routes will follow the same path, while in asymmetric hash functions, bidirectional traffic can follow different paths in both directions. Hash algorithm can be symmetric or asymmetric. The load balancing function of the ECMP is configured globally on the system. Router R1 routing table for 10.0.40/24 will contain the following routes: ![]() In the following figures, routers R1 and R2 can both access each of their router peer networks. Last clearing of "show interface" counters: NeverĦ0 seconds ingress rate : 0 bits/sec, 0 bytes/sec, 0 packets/secĦ0 seconds egress rate : 0 bits/sec, 0 bytes/sec, 0 packets/secĮqual-cost multi-path routing (ECMP) is a routing strategy where next-hop packet forwarding to a single destination can occur over multiple paths. MTU : 1500 bytes (Maximum packet size 1522 bytes) Switch (config interface ethernet 1/10)# show interfaces ethernet 1/10 Once configured, router port interfaces no longer partake in the bridging activities of the switch and VLANs configured on them are separate from the pool allocated for the switch ports. Router port interfaces are assigned an IP address and all 元 commands become applicable to them. Router port interface is a regular switch port configured to operate as an 元 interface. Loopback interface is a logical software entity where traffic transmitted to this interface is immediately received on the sending end. If two hosts from two different subnets need to communicate (via the IP layer), the network administrator needs to configure two interface VLANs, one for each of the subnets.Įach interface VLAN has the following attributes: VLAN interface is a logical IPv4 interface created per subnet over a specific 802.1Q VLAN ID. Since 169.254.101.101 is already used as BGP unnumbered neighbor address, it is recommended not to use this address in the network if BGP unnumbered neighbor is to ever be enabled. ![]() Only unique addresses from that range can be assigned to IP interface, same address assignment is not supported. However, I would like it if this is brought to the attention of TP-Link engineers, for the sake of future products.IPv4 link local IP addresses such as .x can be assigned to IP interfaces, thus allowing all routing, forwarding functions and applications on top of the interfaces to function as the real IP addresses. I realize this is probably impossible to fix with a firmware update - even if it can be, it would be an unexpected change for many users, and that's not normally welcome. I expect to reach it only by explicitly using the router's local IP, which is 192.168.1.3 in the screenshot above. In this case, the router's FTP server is only available from the LAN, so I don't expect NAT loopback to reach it. In the case of NAT loopback, connections should be treated as though they came from the WAN and be routed according to those rules. In my opinion, this is unwanted behavior. (screenshot is from the emulator, but settings are similar to my own)Īs soon as I disabled the second line "FTP", everything started working as it should. The issue was that the router had its own FTP server for the USB storate, and for local connections it was apparently taking priority: I was trying to access an FTP server hosted by a Raspberry Pi on my network. UPDATE: Everything is actually working fine (sort of), this was a case of minor misconfiguration.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |